In the Morning

Posts tagged education

Why not eliminate schooling between age 12-16? It’s biologically + psychologically too turbulent a time to be cooped up inside, made to sit all the time. During these years, kids would live communally — doing some work, anyway being physically active, in the countryside; learning about sex — free of their parents. Those four ‘missing’ years of school could be added on, at a much later age. At, say, age 50-54 everyone would have to go back to school. (One could get a deferment for a few years, in special cases, if one was in a special work or creative project that couldn’t be broken off.) In this 50-54 schooling, have strong pressure to learn a new job or profession — plus liberal arts stuff, general science (ecology, biology), and language skills.

This simple change in the age specificity of schooling would a) reduce adolescent discontent, anomie, boredom, neurosis; b) radically modify the almost inevitable process by which people at 50 are psychologically and intellectually ossified — have become increasingly conservative, politically — and retrograde in their tastes (Neil Simon plays, etc.)

There would no longer be one huge generation gap (war), between the young and the not young — but 5 or 6 generation gaps, each much less severe.

After all, since most people from now on are going to live to be 70, 75, 80, why should all their schooling be bunched together in the first 1/3 or 1/4 of their lives — so that it’s downhill all the way

Early schooling — age 6-12 — would be intensive language skills, basic science, civics, the arts.

Back to school at 16: liberal arts for two years
Age 18-21: job training through apprenticeship, not schooling


-Susan Sontag

I don’t know about the age 50-54. Maybe move it ten years back, like the 40s.

Perhaps the essence of the Liberal outlook could be summed up in a new decalogue, not intended to replace the old one but only to supplement it. The Ten Commandments that, as a teacher, I should wish to promulgate, might be set forth as follows:

1. Do not feel absolutely certain of anything.

2. Do not think it worth while to proceed by concealing evidence, for the evidence is sure to come to light.

3. Never try to discourage thinking for you are sure to succeed.

4. When you meet with opposition, even if it should be from your husband or your children, endeavor to overcome it by argument and not by authority, for a victory dependent upon authority is unreal and illusory.

5. Have no respect for the authority of others, for there are always contrary authorities to be found.

6. Do not use power to suppress opinions you think pernicious, for if you do the opinions will suppress you.

7. Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

8. Find more pleasure in intelligent dissent than in passive agreement, for, if you value intelligence as you should, the former implies a deeper agreement than the latter.

9. Be scrupulously truthful, even if the truth is inconvenient, for it is more inconvenient when you try to conceal it.

10. Do not feel envious of the happiness of those who live in a fool’s paradise, for only a fool will think that it is happiness.

Bertrand Russell
Quoted in Brainpickings.orgimage

No, no, no.
Layogenic is not a real word, not in the Tagalog Language. It’s a made up word that comes from “Photogenic” - Layo means far. So Layogenic is a slang term referring to something that looks good from afar.

Teachers shouldn’t encourage it’s use. It’s uneducated.

thelearningbrain:

laughingstation:

via laughingstation

Apparently in the Tagalog language there is a word for this: 

3. Layogenic (Tagalog)
Remember in Clueless when Cher describes someone as “a full-on Monet… from far away, it’s OK, but up close it’s a big old mess”? That’s exactly what this word means.

source: 14 Wonderful Words With No English Equivalent

(via thelearningbrain)

I pressed enter too soon, and my comment ended up saying, “Perhaps tablets can teach children how to read.”The rest of the comment was supposed to be: 
Perhaps tablets can teach children how to read. Afterwards, tablets can advise them on what to do with their new knowledge. When it proves too difficult for some, tablets can comfort the children and tell them it’s going to be okay.  THEN, tablets can meet with the parents and explain the child’s difficulty.  As far as social development goes, well, the tablet can help as well. Facebook has an tablet app, after all.
:-)
———————————————————————Nothing against tablets, as they might work, and provide that hope for children with no access to education. The tablets, however have quite a ways to go before it can call itself a teacher.A good follow question for this would be:Would you entrust the education of your child to a tablet? 
gjmueller:

Can Tablets Take the Place of Teachers?

I pressed enter too soon, and my comment ended up saying, “Perhaps tablets can teach children how to read.”

The rest of the comment was supposed to be: 

Perhaps tablets can teach children how to read. Afterwards, tablets can advise them on what to do with their new knowledge. When it proves too difficult for some, tablets can comfort the children and tell them it’s going to be okay.  THEN, tablets can meet with the parents and explain the child’s difficulty.  

As far as social development goes, well, the tablet can help as well. Facebook has an tablet app, after all.

:-)

———————————————————————

Nothing against tablets, as they might work, and provide that hope for children with no access to education. The tablets, however have quite a ways to go before it can call itself a teacher.

A good follow question for this would be:
Would you entrust the education of your child to a tablet? 

gjmueller:

Can Tablets Take the Place of Teachers?